To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Greater Return to Sports Post ACLR Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction vs ACLR Alone

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2025

Greater Return to Sports Post ACLR Combined With Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction vs ACLR Alone

Vol: 307| Issue: 3| Number:76| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Greater return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction compared with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alone: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Exp Orthop. 2025 Jan 5;12(1):e70127.

Contributing Authors:
I Lumban-Gaol D Putramega KY Phatama DN Utomo NC Budhiparama

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Fourteen studies, including 2,357 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries, were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ACL reconstruction (ACLR) alone versus ACLR combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR). Pooled outcomes of interest included return to sports rate, return to competition rate, Tegner score, and anterior cruciate ligament-retu...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue