To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Intra-articular analgesia in reducing postoperative pain post sacroiliac joint fusion

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2024

Intra-articular analgesia in reducing postoperative pain post sacroiliac joint fusion

Vol: 306| Issue: 12| Number:31| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effectiveness of intra-articular analgesia in reducing postoperative pain after minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Sci Rep. 2024 01-Sep;():. 10.1038/s41598-024-73638-8

Contributing Authors:
SMM Hermans JM Nellensteijn R Knoef H van Santbrink R Droeghaag J Most MK Reinders DMN Hoofwijk JW Potters KLL Movig I Curfs WLW van Hemert

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Forty-two patients undergoing minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF) were randomized to receive intra-articular infiltration with bupivacaine 0.50% (n=22) or placebo (NaCl 0.9%) (n=19). The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) over 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, recovery scores, adver...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue