To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Microscopic Bilateral Laminotomy vs Total Laminectomy With Posterior Spinal Fusion (LF) for Stenosis

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2025

Microscopic Bilateral Laminotomy vs Total Laminectomy With Posterior Spinal Fusion (LF) for Stenosis

Vol: 307| Issue: 2| Number:11| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Clinical Outcomes Following Decompression of Central Canal and Lateral Recess Simultaneous Stenosis, with a Focus on Multilevel Stenosis: A Randomized Comparison of Microscopic Bilateral Laminotomy versus Total Laminectomy with Posterior Spinal Fusion.

World Neurosurg . 2024 Jul:187:e257-e263.

Contributing Authors:
P Shafiekhani M Hajimohammadebrahim-Ketabforoush EA Jajin S Zandpazandi M Shahmohammadi

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Ninety-six patients with multilevel lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS) and lateral recess stenosis (LRS) were randomized to receive either total laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion (LF) (n=48) or microscopic bilateral laminotomy (n=48). However, only 76 patients completed the study. The primary outcome of interest was leg pain relief as measured by the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue