To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Choice of Entry Point for Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing in Patients with Shaft of Femur Fractures

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2024

Choice of Entry Point for Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing in Patients with Shaft of Femur Fractures

Vol: 306| Issue: 10| Number:13| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Choice of Entry Point Does Not Affect Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Antegrade Intra-medullary Nailing in Patients with Shaft of Femur Fracture: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Indian J Orthop . 2024 Feb 14;58(4):339-344.

Contributing Authors:
A Gaurav P Kumar P Sudesh M Prakash SC Meena S Patel V Kumar

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Forty-nine patients with femoral shaft fractures were randomized to receive either greater trochanter (GT) entry nailing (n=24) or piriformis entry (PE) nailing (n=25). The primary outcome of interest was the drop in hemoglobin levels, and the secondary outcomes included surgical time, fluoroscopy exposure, functional outcomes (measured by the Modified Harris Hip Score), radiological healing, and ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue