LOGIN
Patient-Specific Instrumentation Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
May 2024
Patient-Specific Instrumentation Versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
No significant differences in clinical outcome and survival between patient-specific instrumentation and conventional total knee arthroplasty: 10 year follow-up of a multicenter double blind randomized controlled trial
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
One hundred twenty-nine patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive either patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) (n=64) or conventional arthroplasty (CA) (n=65). The primary outcome of interest was patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Secondary outcomes of interest included revision rates and signs of loosening of the components on X-rays. Outcomes were assessed up to 10 ye...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.