To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Five-Year Stability of Cementless 3D-Printed vs Cemented Tibial Components - Total Knee Arthroplasty

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2025

Five-Year Stability of Cementless 3D-Printed vs Cemented Tibial Components - Total Knee Arthroplasty

Vol: 307| Issue: 8| Number:80| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Continued Stabilization of a Cementless 3D-Printed Total Knee Arthroplasty: Five-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Using Radiostereometric Analysis.

J Bone Joint Surg Am . 2023 Nov 1;105(21):1686-1694.

Contributing Authors:
TJN van der Lelij PJ Marang-van de Mheen BL Kaptein S Toksvig-Larsen RGHH Nelissen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-two patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to receive a cementless 3D-printed cruciate-retaining tibial component (n=36) or a cemented cruciate-retaining tibial component (n=36). The primary outcome was maximum total point motion (MTPM) of the tibial component at 5 years. Secondary outcomes included progression of migration between 2 and 5 years, the proportion of continuously m...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue