To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No Increase In Adverse Events With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Augmentation Of ACLR

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2025

No Increase In Adverse Events With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Augmentation Of ACLR

Vol: 307| Issue: 6| Number:42| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

No increase in adverse events with lateral extra-articular tenodesis augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - Results from the stability randomized trial.

J ISAKOS . 2023 Aug;8(4):246-254.

Contributing Authors:
M Heard H Marmura D Bryant R Litchfield R McCormack P MacDonald T Spalding P Verdonk D Peterson D Bardana A Rezansoff A Getgood

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Six hundred and eighteen patients aged 14–25 years with ACL-deficient knees were randomized to receive either hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction alone (n=312) or with an additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) (n=306). The primary outcome was graft rupture. Secondary outcomes included minor medical events, minor surgical events, contralateral ACL ruptures, overall reoperation rates, pa...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue