To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Costoclavicular vs. Interscalene Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Under Monitored Anesthesia

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2025

Costoclavicular vs. Interscalene Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery Under Monitored Anesthesia

Vol: 307| Issue: 6| Number:131| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effects of the costoclavicular block versus interscalene block in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery under monitored anesthesia care: a randomized, prospective, non-inferiority study.

Korean J Anesthesiol . 2023 Oct;76(5):413-423.

Contributing Authors:
Q Luo J Zheng C Yang W Wei K Wang X Xiang W Yao

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Two hundred twelve patients undergoing elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized to receive either an interscalene block (ISB, n=106) or a costoclavicular block (CCB, n=106) as the sole anesthetic under monitored anesthesia. The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients achieving complete motor blockade of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) and the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic par...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue