LOGIN
COA 2022: Retear Rates and Clinical Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair With vs. Without Augmentation
June 2022
COA 2022: Retear Rates and Clinical Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair With vs. Without Augmentation
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1
Rotator cuff repair with graft augmentation improves clinical and structural outcomes and decreases retear rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Six studies with a total of 257 shoulders were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing rotator cuff repair with vs. without autograft/allograft augmentation. The outcome of interest were functional outcome scores and retear rates with a minimum follow-up period of one year. The results of this meta-analysis found that autograft/allograft augmentation resulted in a significan...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.