To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Peri-articular Injection in Shoulder Arthroscopy Patients

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2022

Erector Spinae Plane Block vs. Peri-articular Injection in Shoulder Arthroscopy Patients

Vol: 255| Issue: 2| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Erector spinae plane block vs. peri-articular injection for pain control after arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomised controlled trial

Anaesthesia. 2022 Mar;77(3):301-310.

Contributing Authors:
H Shanthanna M Czuczman P Moisiuk T O'Hare M Khan M Forero K Davis J Moro T Vanniyasingam G Foster L Thabane B Alolabi

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty two patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized to receive a preoperative T2 erector spinae block (n=31) or a peri-articular injection at the end of surgery (n=31). The primary outcome of interest was resting pain in the recovery room. Secondary outcomes of interest included pain scores with movement, opioid use, patient satisfaction and adverse effects. There were no s...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue