To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Pericapsular Nerve Block vs. Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2022

Pericapsular Nerve Block vs. Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in THA

Vol: 227| Issue: 1| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block versus Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

J Pers Med. 2022 01-Mar;():. 10.3390/jpm12030408

Contributing Authors:
YS Choi KK Park B Lee WS Nam DH Kim

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Fifty-eight patients undergoing a total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive a pericapsular nerve blockade (n=29) or a supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (n=29). The primary outcomes of interest were Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores at rest and during movement. Secondary outcomes of interest included opioid consumption, quadriceps muscle strength, intra-operative anesthesi...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue