To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Effect Of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo And Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2025

Effect Of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo And Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain

Vol: 307| Issue: 5| Number:45| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effect of Pain Reprocessing Therapy vs Placebo and Usual Care for Patients With Chronic Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Psychiatry . 2022 Jan 1;79(1):13-23.

Contributing Authors:
YK Ashar A Gordon H Schubiner C Uipi K Knight Z Anderson J Carlisle L Polisky S Geuter TF Flood PA Kragel S Dimidjian MA Lumley TD Wager

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred fifty-one adults with chronic primary back pain were randomized to receive pain reprocessing therapy (n=50), open-label placebo (n=51), or usual care (n=50). The primary outcome was average back pain intensity over the past week at posttreatment. Secondary outcomes included pain-related disability, depression, anxiety, anger, sleep quality, and positive/negative affect. Outcomes were a...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue