To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2025

Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Vol: 307| Issue: 3| Number:105| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):942-951.

Contributing Authors:
Z Ghogawala N Terrin MR Dunbar JL Breeze KM Freund AS Kanter PV Mummaneni EF Bisson FG Barker JS Schwartz JS Harrop

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred sixty-three patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy were randomized to receive either ventral decompression and fusion (n=63) or dorsal surgery (laminectomy with fusion or laminoplasty, n=100). The primary outcome was the change in the SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) score at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included changes in the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Associ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue