To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar Functional Outcomes Post-Op With Joint Lavage vs Placebo in Displaced Proximal Humerus Fxs

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2021

Similar Functional Outcomes Post-Op With Joint Lavage vs Placebo in Displaced Proximal Humerus Fxs

Vol: 24| Issue: 1| Number:5| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Glenohumeral joint lavage does not affect clinical outcomes in open reduction and internal fixation of displaced intracapsular proximal humeral fractures: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Sep;29(9): 1758-1764

Contributing Authors:
N Biermann M Schirren G Siebenbürger E Fleischhacker T Helfen W Böcker B Ockert

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Seventy-two patients with displaced intracapsular proximal humeral fractures were randomized to receive internal fixation and open reduction in combination with intraoperative glenohumeral joint lavage (n=36) or without lavage (n=36). Primary outcomes of interests included shoulder range of motion (ROM; internal fixation, external rotation, forward flexion, and abduction) and Constant Score at 6 ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue