To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No Improvement in Dysphasia Outcomes with Bupivacaine HCl in Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
March 2021

No Improvement in Dysphasia Outcomes with Bupivacaine HCl in Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion

Vol: 13| Issue: 1| Number:1| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Local Retropharyngeal Space Anesthetic for Dysphagia Reduction after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

World Neurosurg. 2021 Feb;146: e1377-e1383.

Contributing Authors:
AT Villavicencio S Rajpal EL Nelson K Beasley V Kantha S Burneikiene

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred and twenty patients undergoing 1- or 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery for treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease with disc herniation, radiculopathy, and/or myelopathy symptoms were randomized to receive a 0.5% bupivacaine hydrochloride solution or 0.9% NaCl normal saline solution which was injected into the retropharyngeal space. Primary outcomes...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue