
No Clinical Benefit With Intensive vs Conventional Early Mobilization for Proximal Humerus Fractures

No Clinical Benefit With Intensive vs Conventional Early Mobilization for Proximal Humerus Fractures
Immediate intensive mobilization compared with immediate conventional mobilization for the impacted osteoporotic conservatively treated proximal humeral fracture: a randomized controlled trial
Musculoskelet Surg . 2017 Dec;101(Suppl 2):137-143Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
Eight patients with stable osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures were randomized to undergo an intensive early mobilization program (n=40) or early conventional mobilization program (n=40). Primary outcomes of interest included function evaluated using the constant shoulder score and the subjective shoulder value (SSV) which were both measured at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up. Additional outcome...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.