LOGIN
Most COVID-19 modelling studies are underperforming, at high risk of bias, and poorly reported
April 2020
Most COVID-19 modelling studies are underperforming, at high risk of bias, and poorly reported
Study Type:Prognosis
OE Level Evidence:3
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal
BMJ 2020;369:m1328Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect nearly the entire world, and has been accompanied by an 'infodemic', whereby an overabundance of information of varying quality continues to be published at unprecedented rates. Thus, the authors of this study conducted a rapid systematic review and critical appraisal of all modelling studies in the literature on the topic of COVID-19. Most studies had poo...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.