To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Surgery vs conservative treatment or subacromial decompression for rotator cuff tears in the elderly

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2019

Surgery vs conservative treatment or subacromial decompression for rotator cuff tears in the elderly

Vol: 8| Issue: 10| Number:15| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Surgical repair versus conservative treatment and subacromial decompression for the treatment of rotator cuff tears

Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1100-1106.

Contributing Authors:
C Schemitsch J Chahal M Vicente L Nowak PH Flurin F Lambers Heerspink P Henry A Nauth

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Six studies (626 patients) were included in this meta-analysis comparing surgical repair to conservative management and subacromial decompression for the treatment of rotator cuff tears in elderly patients. The primary outcome of interest was the Constant-Murley score. Results revealed significantly favourable pooled Constant-Murley scores in the surgical repair group compared to both the conserva...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue