To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Improvement in target error of acetabular cup inclination with supine vs. lateral position in THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2019

Improvement in target error of acetabular cup inclination with supine vs. lateral position in THA

Vol: 8| Issue: 10| Number:11| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:2

Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: A randomized single-blind controlled trial

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):915-922.

Contributing Authors:
R Takada T Jinno K Miyatake M Hirao K Yagishita T Yoshii A Okawa

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Sixty patients with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis and scheduled for a unilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) via a minimally invasive Watson-Jones approach were randomized to receive the operation in a supine position or a lateral position. The primary outcome of interest was acetabular cup position, measured radiographically as the absolute target error of acetabular cup inclination and antevers...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue