LOGIN
OTA 2019: No difference in outcomes between AIBG and cement in tibial plateau fracture bone defects
November 2019
OTA 2019: No difference in outcomes between AIBG and cement in tibial plateau fracture bone defects
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Autologous Iliac Bone Graft versus Biphasic Hydroxyapatite/Calcium Sulfate Cement for Treatment of Bone Defects in Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Bone graft substitutes are generally required in tibial plateau fractures. Previous studies have established calcium phosphate as superior to autogenous iliac crest bone graft (AIBG), at least in terms of subsidence. The authors in this study randomized 137 patients with AO 41-B2 and 41-B3 fractures to receiver either AIBG or a hydroxyapatite/calcium sulfate cement. Outcomes measured were the SF-1...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.