To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference between a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt and lumbar support on walking capacity

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
April 2019

No difference between a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt and lumbar support on walking capacity

Vol: 8| Issue: 4| Number:38| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effect of a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt versus a lumbar support on walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial

Spine J. 2019 Mar;19(3):386-394.

Contributing Authors:
M Schneider G Hawker A Ahmed YR Rampersaud C Ammendolia D Southerst P Cote C Bombardier

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

104 patients with lumbar stenosis and symptomatic neurogenic claudication were randomized to receive a prototype lumbar spinal stenosis belt or a lumbar support. The primary outcome of interest was walking capacity, measured with the self-paced walking test (SPWT). The proportion of patients who displayed a minimum 30% and 50% improvement in the SPWT was also calculated. Follow up was performed wi...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue