To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar clinical outcome and survivorship over 10 years between robotic versus hand rasping in THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2018

Similar clinical outcome and survivorship over 10 years between robotic versus hand rasping in THA

Vol: 7| Issue: 12| Number:13| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:2

Does Robotic Milling For Stem Implantation in Cementless THA Result in Improved Outcomes Scores or Survivorship Compared with Hand Rasping? Results of a Randomized Trial at 10 Years

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Nov;476(11):2169-2173. doi: 10.1097

Contributing Authors:
I Nakahara N Nakamura T Sakai N Sugano

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

130 patients scheduled for cementless total hip arthroplasty were randomized to femoral preparation with either robotic milling assistance or manual hand rasping. Patients were assessed for clinical score and radiographic outcomes over a minimum of 10 years postoperatively. Results demonstrated no significant difference between groups in Japanese Orthopaedic Association sore or incidence of develo...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue