LOGIN
Nonoperative treatment versus suspensory device fixation for type III-IV AC joint dislocations
December 2018
Nonoperative treatment versus suspensory device fixation for type III-IV AC joint dislocations
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Open Reduction and Tunneled Suspensory Device Fixation Compared with Nonoperative Treatment for Type-III and Type-IV Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations: The ACORN Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 21;100(22):1912-1918. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00412Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
60 patients with type III-IV acromioclavicular joint dislocation were randomized to either surgical intervention with open reduction and tunneled suspensory device fixation (ORTSD group) or to nonoperative treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare disability and function over the first year of follow-up. Results on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score and the Oxfo...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.