LOGIN
SICOT2018: No difference in PROMs, patella crepitus between resurfacing versus retention in TKA
October 2018
SICOT2018: No difference in PROMs, patella crepitus between resurfacing versus retention in TKA
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
A COMPARISON OF PATELLA RESURFACING VERSUS RETENTION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR PATIENT SATISFACTION AND PATELLAR CREPITUS AFTER SURGERY
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
63 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either patellar resurfacing or patellar retention. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of patellar crepitus, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction between groups over short-term follow-up. Mean follow-up was 8.68 months postoperatively. Results demonstrated no significant differences between groups in either rat...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.