To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Telephone based weight loss support program for knee OA ineffective in pain relief and weight loss

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2019

Telephone based weight loss support program for knee OA ineffective in pain relief and weight loss

Vol: 8| Issue: 2| Number:27| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Telephone-based weight loss support for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018 Apr;26(4):485–94.

Contributing Authors:
KM O'Brien J Wiggers A Williams E Campbell RK Hodder L Wolfenden SL Yoong EK Robson R Haskins C Rissel CM Williams SJ Kamper

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

120 obese or overweight patients with joint pain caused by knee osteoarthritis were randomized into rehabilitation with either a non disease-specific and telephone-based weight loss and support program (invention group; n=60) or the usual care protocol of orthopaedic consultation or surgery if necessary (usual care group; n=60). Patients of the intervention group received up to ten 2-hour telephon...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue