To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Exeter/Unitrax modular hemiarthroplasty vs. Thompson hemiarthroplasty after intracapsular fracture

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2018

Exeter/Unitrax modular hemiarthroplasty vs. Thompson hemiarthroplasty after intracapsular fracture

Vol: 7| Issue: 5| Number:3| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A randomized controlled trial comparing the Thompson hemiarthroplasty with the Exeter polished tapered stem and Unitrax modular head in the treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip

Bone Joint J. 2018 Mar 1;100-B(3):352-360

Contributing Authors:
N Parsons J Achten ML Costa MR Reed XL Griffin AL Sims

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

964 patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip were randomized to either modular hemiarthroplasty with a cemented Exeter stem and Unitrax femoral head or monoblock hemiarthroplasty iwth a cemented Thompson implant. Patients were assessed at 4 months postoperative for the primary outcome of health-related quality of life on the EQ-5D questionnaire. Results demonstrated no significant differ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue