LOGIN
Ultracongruent tibial insert vs. posterior-stabilized implant in total knee arthroplasty
June 2018
Ultracongruent tibial insert vs. posterior-stabilized implant in total knee arthroplasty
Study Type:N/A
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1
No difference in range of motion between ultracongruent and posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3515-3521Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
136 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to an ultracongruent tibial insert or a posterior-stabilized total knee implant. Patients were assessed over a 1-year follow-up. Groups did not demonstrate any significant differences in knee range of motion or function on the UCLA activity score at 1 year. Oxford Knee Scores were significantly greater in the UC group compared to t...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.