To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

OTA: Flexible casts with home removal for minimally displaced radial fracture

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites

OTA: Flexible casts with home removal for minimally displaced radial fracture

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:285| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

SCRATCH (Self Cast Removal at the Child’s Home): Treatment of Stable Pediatric Forearm Fractures Using Home Removable Casts Compared With Traditional Cast Therapy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

317 children with distal forearm torus, minimally angulated greenstick, or nondisplaced stable epiphyseal fractures were randomized to receive a flexible below-elbow cast with home removal or a fiberglass below-elbow cast with hospital removal. The study determined that flexible below-elbow casts with home removal are safe and cost-effective alternatives to the traditional fiberglass casts with hospital removal.

Why was this study needed now?

Paediatric forearm fractures are very common, and the use of a immobilization system that allows for home removal may be able to reduce medical costs significantly. This study aimed to determine whether flexible below-elbow casts with home removal are a safe and cost effective fracture treatment method, when compared to fiberglass below-elbow casts with hospital removal for children with nondisplaced stable epiphyseal fractures.

What was the principal research question?

Is a flexible below-elbow cast with home removal a safe and cost-effective method to treat pediatric minimally displaced forearm fractures, when compared to traditional fiberglass below-elbow casts with hospital removal?

Study Characteristics -
Population:
317 children with distal forearm torus, minimally angulated greenstick, or nondisplaced stable epiphyseal fractures (Mean age: 9.3 (2 to 16) years).
Intervention:
Flexible below-elbow cast with home removal (n=159).
Comparison:
Fiberglass below-elbow cast with hospital removal (n=158).
Outcomes:
The primary outcome measured was the change in Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) score from baseline to 1 week post cast removal. The secondary outcomes measured were the change in CHAQ and EW-5D scores from baseline to 6 months post-injury, change in EQ-5D from baseline to 1 week post cast removal, user satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness.
Methods:
RCT: Prospective; Single-Center
Time:
6 months post-injury

What were the important findings?

  • The difference in change in CHAQ score from baseline to 1 week post cast removal between the flexible cast group and fiberglass cast group was found to be not statistically significant (p=0.245).
  • There difference in CHAQ score and EQ-5D score at 6 months post-injury was found to be not significant in both the flexible cast and fiberglass cast groups.
  • The mean cost of treatment was $246 for the flexible home removal casts and $400 for the fiberglass hospital removal casts, which was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05).
  • The difference in satisfaction measures between the flexible cast group and the fiberglass cast group.
  • Findings based on a sub-population of patients with minimally displaced fractures.

What should I remember most?

It must be stressed that these results were found in patients with minimally displaced distal radius fractures. The findings suggests that although there was no significant difference in arm function and satisfaction between the two cast types, the flexible below-elbow cast with home removal was significantly more cost-effective for paediatric patients with minimally displaced forearm fractures.

How will this affect the care of my patients?

The study suggests that flexible below-elbow casts with home removal may be a safe and cost-effective treatment method for children with minimally displaced forearm fractures. Further research using larger sample sizes is required to confirm the findings of this study.

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue