Loading...
Search Filters
Date Range
toReport Types
Condition
See all (50)
Region of the Body
See all (21)
Specialties
See all (18)
Emerging Treatments
OE Recommends Topics
Multimedia
Journal
Conference Series
Evidence Series
Showing 1 - 20 of 1116
Syndesmotic screw fixation vs. no fixation in supination-external rotation ankle fractures
Foot Ankle Int. 2014 Oct;35(10):988-95.
Better function, pain, and reduction with suture button vs screw fixation for syndesmotic injury
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jan 3;100(1):2-12
Similar malreduction rate, functional outcome between TightRope and syndesmotic screw
Injury. 2015 Jun;46(6):1119-26
Syndesmotic screw retention vs. removal in fibular fracture with tibiofibular diastasis
Bone Joint J. 2014 Dec;96-B(12):1699-705
Bioabsorbable screws comparable to metallic in tibiofibular syndesmotic fixation
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015 Jul-Aug;54(4):657-62.
The management of syndesmotic instability in external-rotation type ankle fractures
Injury. 2016 Jul;47(7):1574-80
Favourable 5-year clinical outcomes with suture button vs. syndesmotic screw for syndesmosis injury
The bone & joint journal. 2020 ;():. 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0692.R2.
Unilateral vs. bilateral screw fixation in degenerative lumbar diseases
Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):974-84. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3221-2.
Uni- vs bilateral pedicle screw fixation in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 6;9(11):e111979.
Lumbar interbody fusion: Uni- & bilateral pedicle screw fixation similar in fusion rate
Eur Spine J. 2014 Feb;23(2):395-403. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-3100-2. Epub 2013 Nov 22
Pedicle screw fixation at fractured vertebra vs conventional pedicle screws for thoracolumbar Frx
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:38-47
Showing 1 - 20 of 1116