OTA2017: No difference in infection rate between NPWT and standard dressing after open fracture

How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. OTA2017: No difference in infection rate between NPWT and standard dressing after open fracture. ACE Report. 2017;6(11):2. Available from: https://myorthoevidene.com/AceReport/Report/9957

Study Type:Randomized Trial

OE Level Evidence:N/A

Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

UK Wound Management of Open Lower Limb Fractures (UK WOLLF): A Randomized Controlled Trial of Standard Wound Management Versus Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Treatment of Adult Patients with an Open Wound Fracture of the Lower Limb

Contributing Authors: ML Costa M Fernandez

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Access conference website and list of abstracts.

Synopsis

460 patients with an open lower limb fracture were randomized to either negative pressure wound therapy or standard dressings following debridement. The primary outcome was disability at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included surgical site infection rate, complication rate, and resource use. At 12 months, no significant difference between groups was observed in disability score. There was also no ...