LOGIN
COA2017: Higher flexion strength with tenodesis vs tenotomy at 6mo; no differences observed at 1yr
June 2017
COA2017: Higher flexion strength with tenodesis vs tenotomy at 6mo; no differences observed at 1yr
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy in treatment of lesions of long head of biceps brachii in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
56 patients with a lesion of the long head of the biceps tendon were randomized to either arthroscopic tenodesis or tenotomy. Patients were assessed for patient-reported function, incidences of cramping, cosmetic deformity, and flexion & supination strength over a 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, as well as secondary outcomes of the ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.