LOGIN
AAOS2017: Similar mid-term outcome between mini-incision posterior Vs. two-incision THA
March 2017
AAOS2017: Similar mid-term outcome between mini-incision posterior Vs. two-incision THA
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Mini-incision Posterior Versus Two-incision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Follow-up Report at a Minimum of Five Years
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
72 patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty were included in this randomized controlled trial to compare mid-term outcomes of two different surgical approaches. Patients were randomized to either a mini-incision posterior approach or a two-incision approach. At a mean follow-up of 8 years, a total of three revisions in the mini-incision group and two revision in the two-incision group ha...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.