A comparison between computer assisted and conventional methods for TKA
A comparison between computer assisted and conventional methods for TKA
Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1273-1284.e1. Epub 2011 Jul 1Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
208 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were recruited for this study. Patients were randomized to undergo TKA using either computer navigational assistance or conventional instrumentation to align the components. At 12 months follow-up, there were no clinically relevant improvements in radiographic alignment, when the computer assisted group was compared to the conventional ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.