To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Mini-invasive intramedullary pin vs. locking compression plate for midshaft clavicle fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2017

Mini-invasive intramedullary pin vs. locking compression plate for midshaft clavicle fractures

Vol: 6| Issue: 10| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Prospective randomized study comparing results of fixation for clavicular shaft fractures with intramedullary nail or locking compression plate

Int Orthop. 2017 Jan;41(1):173-17

Contributing Authors:
M Calbiyik D Ipek M Taskoparan

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

75 patients with Robinson type 2B1-2 displaced midshaft clavicle fractures were included in this trial to compare outcomes using a minimally invasive intramedullary nail technique or a standard locking compression plate. Patients were evaluated over a minimum 12-month follow-up period and outcomes included operative time, fluoroscopy time, length of surgical incision, amount of clavicle shortening...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue