To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

LIPUS does not expedite union or functional recovery following tibial fracture fixation

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
May 2017

LIPUS does not expedite union or functional recovery following tibial fracture fixation

Vol: 6| Issue: 5| Number:8| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Re-evaluation of low intensity pulsed ultrasound in treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): randomized clinical trial

BMJ. 2016 Oct 25;355

Contributing Authors:
TA Einhorn M Bhandari Tornetta P JW Busse E Schemitsch JD Heckman KS Leung GH Guyatt GJ Della Rocca D Heels-Ansdell S Makosso-Kallyth TRUST Investigators writing group CB Jones

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

501 patients with a closed or open tibial shaft fracture were randomized to postoperative use of either therapeutic low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) or sham, daily, until fracture union. The purpose of this study was to compare functional recovery and the time to union between groups within a 52-week follow-up. Results demonstrated that postoperative use of LIPUS after tibial fracture fixat...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue