LOGIN
ORIF vs. PRFK for complications, function, quality in patients with calcaneal fractures
January 2017
ORIF vs. PRFK for complications, function, quality in patients with calcaneal fractures
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Percutaneous Reduction and Fixation with Kirschner Wires versus Open Reduction Internal Fixation for the Management of Calcaneal Fractures: A Meta-Analysis
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 26;6:30480.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
18 randomized controlled trials (n=1407 patients, 1442 fractures) were included in this meta-analysis for the purpose of comparing percutaneous reduction and fixation with Kirschner Wires (PRFK) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in the treatment of closed calcaneal fractures. Outcomes of interest included complications related to the surgical wound, postoperative function, and the qu...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.