To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparison of radiological alignment between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
September 2016

Comparison of radiological alignment between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific TKA

Vol: 5| Issue: 9| Number:19| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A radiological analysis of the difference between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides for total knee arthroplasty from the same manufacturer: a randomised controlled trial

Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):786-92

Contributing Authors:
MG Schotanus R Sollie EH van Haaren RP Hendrickx EJ Jansen NP Kort

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

140 patients with knee osteoarthritis scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to undergo the procedure with either the use of MRI-based or CT-based patient-specific instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of radiographic outliers in the coronal and sagittal planes, as well as the accuracy in predicting component sizing between groups. The results demonstrat...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue