To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Accuracy and clinical effects improved with ultrasound-guided vs landmark arthrocentesis

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2016

Accuracy and clinical effects improved with ultrasound-guided vs landmark arthrocentesis

Vol: 5| Issue: 8| Number:21| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Ultrasound-guided versus landmark in knee arthrocentesis: A systematic review

Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Apr;45(5):627-32

Contributing Authors:
T Wu Y Dong HX Song Y Fu JH Li

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Nine studies (7 RCTs and 2 nRCTs) were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis to evaluate to accuracy and clinical effects of ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis versus landmark-guided arthrocentesis. Accuracy was significantly higher with ultrasound-guided arthrocentesis compared landmark-guided arthrocentesis. Pooled results for both pain during arthrocentesis and at 2 week follow-up also dem...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue