LOGIN
ISASS 2016: Slump sitting vs. conventional flexion radiographs for instability diagnoses
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
60 patients with mechanical low back pain were randomized to a slump sitting method or a conventional method when surgeons were obtaining lumbar flexion radiographs to determine spinal instability. Although patients underwent both methods, randomization indicated which method would be performed first. The study was conducted in order to determine which method was able to more effectively identify ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.