LOGIN
ISASS 2016: Mini-invasive SI joint fusion vs nonsurgical treatment of SI joint dysfunction
April 2016
ISASS 2016: Mini-invasive SI joint fusion vs nonsurgical treatment of SI joint dysfunction
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium Implants vs. Non-surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
148 patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint dysfunction were randomized to either undergo minimally invasive (MIS) sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, or to nonoperative treatment. The study was conducted in order to evaluate if minimally invasive operative management offered a significant benefit regarding clinical outcome when compared to nonoperative treatment. A greater success rate was reported in...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.