Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
RCT
ACE Report #8885
Ace Report Cover Spine

ISASS 2016: Robot-assisted vs. freehand pedicle screw fixation may be more accurate & safe


Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Robot-assisted vs. Freehand Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Lumbar Spine - A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial – A Perspective for Early Radiological and Perioperative Outcomes

Contributing Authors: HJ Kim

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

78 patients with degenerative lumbar disc disease were randomized to either a robot-assisted minimally invasive instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion (Rom-PLIF) or the conventional open approach (Cop-PLIF). The object of this study was to compare the two approaches in their accuracy and safety. Findings indicated that robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion for minimally invasive surgical ...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE

Please Login or Join to leave comments.