ISASS 2016: 1-yr results silicon nitride device vs. PEEK cages with autograft in ACDF
Porous Silicon Nitride Spacers versus PEEK Cages with Autograft: 12 Month Data from the CASCADE Randomized Trial
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
96 patients with radicular symptoms due to single-level disc herniation and/or osteophytes of the cervical spine and scheduled for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) were randomized to undergo the procedure with either a polyetheretherketone cage filled with autograft, or a silicon nitride spacer containing porous silicon nitride without graft material. The study was conducted in order...
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.