LOGIN
Some benefits seen with minimally invasive vs. open surgery posterior lumbar fusion
August 2016
Some benefits seen with minimally invasive vs. open surgery posterior lumbar fusion
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:3
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):416-27Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
One randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 25 comparative cohort studies (n=14 prospective; 11 retrospective) were included in this meta-analysis to compared safety and efficacy outcomes between minimally invasive and open posterior lumbar fusion. The findings of this analysis demonstrated significantly favourable outcomes in terms of estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, time to ambulati...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.