Quasi-randomized trial evaluating pelvic packing vs angioembolization in pelvic fractures
Quasi-randomized trial evaluating pelvic packing vs angioembolization in pelvic fractures
Retroperitoneal packing or angioembolization for haemorrhage control of pelvic fractures-Quasi-randomized clinical trial of 56 haemodynamically unstable patients with Injury Severity Score ≥33
Injury. 2016 Feb;47(2):395-401Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
56 haemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures were quasi-randomized (dependent on the availability of angioembolization team) to either retroperitoneal pelvic packing or angioembolization. The purpose of this study was to determine whether pelvic packing is a more effective method to mitigate uncontrollable haemorrhage compared to angioembolization. Findings indicated that the mort...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.