To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Cervical plus thoracic manipulation vs. mobilization and exercise for cervicogenic headaches

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2018

Cervical plus thoracic manipulation vs. mobilization and exercise for cervicogenic headaches

Vol: 7| Issue: 11| Number:16| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Upper cervical and upper thoracic manipulation versus mobilization and exercise in patients with cervicogenic headache: a multi-center randomized clinical trial

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Feb 6;17(1):64

Contributing Authors:
JR Dunning R Butts F Mourad I Young C Fernandez-de-Las Peñas M Hagins T Stanislawski J Donley D Buck TR Hooks JA Cleland

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

110 patients with cervicogenic headache were randomized to receive either cervical and thoracic manipulation or mobilization and exercise. The purpose of this study was to compare the two treatment methods to determine their effects in treating cervicogenic headaches. Findings indicated significantly greater reductions for headache intensity, frequency, and duration, as well as improvements in dis...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue