Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Volume:5 Issue:3 Number:100 ISSN#:2563-5476
ACE Report #8695
Ace Report Cover Arthroplasty

AAOS 2016: Articulating vs. static spacer in 2-stage revision after PJI of TKA

How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. AAOS 2016: Articulating vs. static spacer in 2-stage revision after PJI of TKA. ACE Report. 2016;5(3):100. Available from: https://myorthoevidene.com/AceReport/Report/8695

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Articulating vs. Static Spacers in the Management of Periprosthetic Knee Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Contributing Authors: KR Berend CJ Della Valle SM Sporer J Parvizi M Austin A Chen PN Chalmers E Kayupov GK Deirmengian

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here


This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.


52 patients who developed periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and scheduled for two-stage replacement arthroplasty were randomized to either articulating or static antibiotic spacers. The purpose of this study was to compare the two types of spacers to determine the optimal treatment pertaining to range of motion, knee society score (KSS), mean operativ...

To view the full report, start your 30-day free trial today

No credit card required

JOIN Forgot Password?

Not sure if you want to join OrthoEvidence?

Access this report without an Account.

Success, an email containing a link to access this report has been sent to your inbox.

CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.


Please Login or Join to leave comments.