LOGIN
AAOS 2016: No significant benefit of PSI over navigation or standard instruments in TKA
March 2016
AAOS 2016: No significant benefit of PSI over navigation or standard instruments in TKA
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Patient Specific Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial with Two Years Follow Up
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
81 patients (90 knees) scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to the procedure with the use of either patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), computer navigation (NAV), or conventional instrumentation (CONV). The purpose of this study was evaluate if PSI offered significantly better results regarding alignment and clinical outcome when compared to NAV and CONV groups. Results demons...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.