Interspinous process device not favorable over decompression for LSS at 2 years
IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trialEur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2295-305
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
159 patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication due to single- or two-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were selected for inclusion. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine how treatment with an interspinous process device without bony decompression compared to bony decompression 2 years post-operatively. At 2 years, there was no significant difference betwe...
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.Continue