To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

OTA 2015: Comparison of first- & second-generation locking plate for distal femur fracture

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2015

OTA 2015: Comparison of first- & second-generation locking plate for distal femur fracture

Vol: 4| Issue: 10| Number:29| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Fixed-Angle Versus Polyaxial Locking Plate Fixation Systems for Periprosthetic and/or Osteoporotic Distal Femoral Fractures

Contributing Authors:
N Kanakaris O Obakponovwe M Costa D Shaw K Mohanty P Giannoudis

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

40 patients with distal femoral fractures (osteoporotic or periprosthetic) were randomized to undergo fixation with either a polyaxial locking plate (Polyax; BIOMET) or first-generation locking plate (LISS; DePuy/SYNTHES). The purpose of the study was to compare the union rates and clinical outcomes between the two plate designs. The results indicated comparable union rates and clinical outcomes b...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue