To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Hyaluronic acid injection similar in symptom & structure of knee OA vs diacerein & placebo

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2016

Hyaluronic acid injection similar in symptom & structure of knee OA vs diacerein & placebo

Vol: 5| Issue: 1| Number:35| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Evaluation of the symptomatic and structural efficacy of a new hyaluronic acid compound, NRD101, in comparison with diacerein and placebo in a 1 year randomised controlled study in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Dec;63(12):1611-7

Contributing Authors:
T Pham A Le Henanff P Ravaud P Dieppe L Paolozzi M Dougados

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

301 patients, over 50 years of age, with knee osteoarthritis, were randomized to receive either oral diacerein treatment (100mg/day) and 3 courses of intra-articular saline injections, oral placebo (100mg/day) and 3 courses of intra-articular saline injections, or oral placebo (100mg/day) and 3 courses of intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections (NRD101). The purpose of the study was to compare ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue